Ronald Henry brings extensive, successful experience in representing incumbents, challengers, awardees, and disappointed bidders in "bid protest" type litigations. In the area of contract performance, Mr. Henry has placed particular emphasis on issues relating to disclosure requirements (e.g., the Truth in Negotiations Act), cost-accounting requirements (FAR cost principles and cost accounting standards), and compliance with contract certifications and specifications. He emphasizes early intervention to seek negotiated, rather than litigated, resolutions. He has also successfully litigated contract claims in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the United States Court of Federal Claims, and agency boards of contract appeals.

In matters of export compliance, Mr. Henry advises clients on licensing; classification and commodity jurisdiction, including appeals of commodity jurisdiction determinations; compliance; and voluntary disclosures. In the merger and acquisition context, Mr. Henry helps clients understand the impact of the multiple regulatory regimes in connection with risk and valuation of targets, and provides due diligence reviews of compliance programs.

Mr. Henry regularly advises clients on import and export trade compliance, including US trade sanctions and embargoes, in matters before the US State Department, US Department of Commerce, and US Treasury Department Office of Foreign Assets Control. He also conducts investigations of potential problems and defends clients in enforcement matters involving each of these departments. He frequently assists clients in conducting and assessing due diligence relating to mergers and acquisitions, joint venture relationships, and other business collaborations. He also provides leadership to quickly determine the nature and scope of the problem, recommend and help implement effective remediation, and evaluate disclosure options or requirements.

He has also worked extensively with clients to develop procedures to prevent or detect irregularities, and to represent the interests of clients who have become the subject of an investigation or accusation by an audit agency (e.g., the Defense Contract Audit Agency), an inspector general, the Department of Justice, Department of State, Department of Commerce, and Department of Treasury.


BIS Invites Comment on Identifying Emerging Technologies Subject to New Export Controls and CFIUS
US Sanctions Against Iran Re-Imposed as Wind-Down Periods for Iran Deal Expire
New Law Expands and Reforms CFIUS Jurisdiction and US Export Controls
Deskbook on Internal Investigations, Corporate Compliance and White Collar Issues (2nd Edition)
PLI Practising Law Institute
President Trump Announces Withdrawal From Iran Deal


  • JD, University of Michigan Law School, 1976, magna cum laude
  • BA, University of Michigan, 1973, Phi Beta Kappa
  • District of Columbia
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
  • US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
  • US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  • US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  • US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  • US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • US District Court, Northern District of Texas
  • US Tax Court
  • US Court of Federal Claims
  • US Court of International Trade
  • US District Court, Western District of Arkansas

Email Disclaimer