Business Ethics Compliance under the DCAA Microscope: How Far to Go in Disclosing Significant Overpayments, Mischarging, Defective Pricing and Subcontractor Awards
April 17-18, 2012
Arlington, VA
GOVERNMENT CONTRACT COST & PRICING
Tailoring Your Pre- and Post-Award Compliance Practices and Audit Preparation to New DCAA and DCMA Priorities
- Scope of DCAA mandate to conduct compliance audits
- Preparing contractor business ethics and conduct programs to meet DCAA expectations: How to ensure compliance with FAR 52.203-13 for commercial and non-commercial item contracts, small business contractors, subcontracts and contracts performed overseas
- Extent to which DCAA is requesting information on compliance that is broader than FAR mandatory disclosure requirements
- When a cost issue becomes a significant overpayment vs. a false claim
- When insignificant overpayments, mischarging and defective pricing need to be disclosed
- Identifying a "significant overpayment"
- Determining when "credible evidence" of a violation of federal criminal law or False Claims Act exists, and how far back you need to go to meet your disclosure obligations
- What triggers mandatory disclosures of subcontractor violations, and how to report violations
- Recent trends in mandatory disclosures: Frequency and scope of detail, and how much is too much
- Trends in penalty amounts and other outcomes of mandatory disclosures
- Reporting subcontractor awards: Reconciling reporting requirements with the need to safeguard proprietary information and trade secrets