News
July 30, 2012

Second Circuit Holds Clause in Patent License/Settlement Agreement Preventing Challenge to Validity of Patent Void

Arnold & Porter Advisory

On July 10, 2012, the Second Circuit ruled that

a settlement agreement which bars a patent licensee from later challenging the patent’s validity is void for public policy reasons under the Supreme Court’s decision in Lear, Inc. v. Adkins, 395 U.S. 653 (1969), where the parties entered into the agreement after an accusation of infringement by the patent owner but prior to any litigation.

Rates Tech. Inc. v. Speakeasy, Inc., No. 11-4462-cv, 2012 WL 2765081, at *1 (2d Cir. July 10, 2012) (citations omitted). This decision is likely to have significant implications for parties contemplating the licensing of patents in settlement of threatened or pending patent litigation.

People

Asim Varma
Asim Varma
Partner
Washington, DC
Edward Han
Edward Han
Partner
Washington, DC
Matthew Shultz
Matthew Shultz
Counsel
Washington, DC
Subscribe
Subscribe Link

Email Disclaimer